Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals: a systematic review of surveillance data (2015–2025)
Authors
Affiliation
- 1 Department of Microbiology, Northfield University
- 2 Institute of Veterinary Public Health, Eastbrook College
Abstract
Objective: To summarise surveillance data on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial isolates from dogs and cats published between 2015 and 2025.
Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, four databases were searched; 87 studies met the inclusion criteria and risk of bias was assessed.
Results: Resistance to aminopenicillins was common in Escherichia coli (pooled 41%), and methicillin resistance was reported in 7–19% of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates. Reporting standards varied widely.
Conclusions: Harmonised surveillance of companion animals is needed within a One Health framework.
Keywords
References
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Google ScholarCrossref
- Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 Google ScholarCrossref
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x Google ScholarCrossref
- R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2025. https://www.R-project.org/ Google ScholarCrossref
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors
CC BY 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.